Rainbow Bible Class

Zephaniah: A Commentary
By Marvin A. Sweeney
Hermeneia. Fortress, Minneapolis, 2003. 227 pp. $ 47.00(cloth). ISBN 0800660498

In recent years we have witnessed resurgent interests in the prophetic books, especially the Book of the Twelve in the form of commentary. Among the Twelve the book of Zephaniah has been somewhat neglected. This will no longer be the case. Marvin Sweeney, one of the major scholars pushing the research of prophetic studies forward, has written a very well-organized and -argued commentary on the book of Zephaniah.

As a part of Hermeneia series, the commentary offers a wealth of insightful information and interpretations on the text of Zephaniah. Among many special features, this commentary broadens the horizon of readers’ perspective on the text by providing the reader with the illuminating interpretation of the various textual traditions such as the MT, LXX, Scrolls from the Judean Wilderness, Targum, Peshitta, Vulgate and Old Latin Texts. These textual traditions are treated here as independent literary works, highlighting the different aspects of the meaning of Prophecy of Zephaniah. These diverse textual traditions presented in their own socio-historical settings are highly effective and make a welcome contribution to the study of prophetic literature.

At a macro-structural level, Sweeney rejects the traditional tripartite division of the book of Zephaniah (judgment oracles against Jerusalem and Judah, judgment oracles against the nations, and salvation oracles of Jerusalem/Judah and the world). Instead, he views the book of Zephaniah as “the presentation of Zephaniah’s parenetic speech to Jerusalem/Judah in which the prophet calls on the audience to seek YHWH”(9). Thus, the book of Zephaniah is divided into two halves under the main heading, Seek YHWH: (a) Announcement of the Day of YHWH (1:2-18) and (b) Avoid punishment on the Day of YHWH (2:1-3:20). Underlying this assertion is Sweeney’s claim that Hosea, Amos, Micah, and Zephaniah, the four minor books whose superscriptions are formulated in a similar fashion, implying a common editor, were probably produced in the Josianic era to support the King’s reform program. Sweeney thus reads  the book of Zephaniah  as a prophetic call for a national repentance and a renewed commitment to YHWH, as a “parenetic speech." For Sweeney, this macro-structural view of the composition of the book of Zephaniah forms the aegis of the text under which all the micro units are to be viewed.

The gem of this commentary lies particularly in Sweeney's judicious examination, "formal analysis," of the texture of the text. Unlike traditional form critics, however, Sweeney’s “formal analysis” is grounded in a thorough investigation of various linguistic issues of syntax, semantics and such. A clear example of this is evident in his treatment of 2:1-4. His "formal-linguistic" reading of the unit enables him to argue that the conjunctive ki at the start of v.4 is to be read as the leading causal clause, motivating the prophet’s call for repentance. Another example is his treatment of hoy in 2:5 and 3:1. However, in the latter case, one may dispute his delimitation of the unit (3:1-4) on the same formal-syntactical ground.

Sweeney's interpretation of the socio-historical setting of 3:14-20 does not make a very strong case. He reads this portion of the text as a product of the Josianic era, a kind of exhortative address to Jerusalem under the Assyrian oppression,  reassuring the Israelites of future restoration (esp. 193-96). Whether this socio-historical reading of the unit can persuade many skeptics who see the unit as a later expansion in the (post-) exilic period is  a moot question. Nevertheless, Sweeney’s thorough analysis of the book of Zephaniah as a literary product during King Josiah’s rule offers a convincing alternative reading. Sweeney's reading of the text also implicitly explores, it seems to me, the subtle difference between the production of the book and the reception and appropriation of the produced text.

In sum, the valuable contribution of Sweeney's commentary lies in his hermeneutical  strategy, in his synchronic and diachronic reading, of the text of Zephaniah  within the Twelve Prophets. To him, the sequence ‘synchrony-diachrony,’ and not vice versa , is crucial, reflecting the influence of “concept analysis school” pioneered by R. P. Knierim. Of course the connection is not so evident in the commentary since all of the materials in the book of Zephaniah is to be located in the time of Josiah's rule. Reading the book of Zephaniah as a part of the Twelve Prophets and observing it being located between Habakkuk and Haggai, compels him to read the book “in relation to the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem, Judah, and the First Temple and the exile of the Judean population in the early sixth century BCE”(2), rather than in relation to Josiah’s religious and political reform.

The book will, no doubt, encourage a plethora of responses, some in agreement and others not. Sweeney's careful and cautious handling of the text, nevertheless,  is a welcome addition to the prestigious Hermeneia series, and for a long time it will serve as a standard commentary for the seasoned scholars and the pastors alike. We are deeply indebted to him for that.

DANIEL HOJOON RYOU
CHEONAN UNIVERSITY
SEOUL, KOREA
번호 제목 글쓴이 날짜 조회 수
공지 류호준 교수의 무지개성서교실이 http://www.rbc2020.kr 로 리뉴얼하여 이전합니다. 류호준 2020.08.24 4396
공지 "무재개 성서교실은 여러분께 드리는 선물입니다!" [5] 류호준 2018.03.29 2928
» Book Review: Interpretation 59 (October, 2005), pp. 428-429에 실린 류호준 교수의 서평 류호준 2006.10.03 89242
828 “십자가에 달린 예수님 좌우편 죄수들의 정체는?” [3] file 류호준 2014.03.20 66365
827 설교: “감사: 쟁기질 하듯이 그렇게”(추수감사절 설교문) [1] 류호준 2007.11.18 59725
826 시: 유고시 1 편 [7] 류호준 2007.06.12 34628
825 신학 에세이: “예언자들의 소명과 우리의 소명”(그말씀 12월호 게제) 류호준 2010.11.09 34264
824 “성금요일과 부활절 그리고 세월호” [4] 류호준 2014.04.18 31571
823 설교: "복음의 긴급성"(눅 10:1-20)(490주년 종교개혁 기념주일) [1] file 류호준 2007.10.29 22976
822 에세이: "나의 네덜란드 유학기" [2] 류호준 2007.11.03 22830
821 "철저한 하나님의 심판" (이사야서 큐티 27) 류호준 2011.07.14 21405
820 설교: “예수님처럼 사랑한다는 것” 류호준 2010.09.23 21048
819 회고 에세이: " “쓰지 말아야 했던 편지” [7] file 류호준 2010.07.23 20833
818 로마서 묵상(26): “하나님 도와주세요!” file 류호준 2010.11.03 20344
817 강해논문: "예레미야의 새 언약" (렘 31:31~34) file 류호준 2006.05.21 20310
816 설교: “환대의 향기” file 류호준 2010.10.10 20080
815 설교: “거인을 죽이는 강심장” file 류호준 2010.12.05 19673
814 신앙 에세이: "버는 것인가 받는 것인가?" [6] 류호준 2008.08.12 19603
813 “희망 없이는 살 수 없어요!”(묵상의 글) [2] 류호준 2008.02.19 19546
812 일상 에세이: “친구 하덕규 이야기” [4] file 류호준 2011.01.09 19453
811 신학 에세이: "겸손과 교만과 정의"(그말씀 3월호 게재예정) 류호준 2011.01.20 18857
810 번역에세이: 희망 (바라는 것) 류호준 2007.12.07 18689